Новость: Новый -stable релиз Linux - 2.6.11.7
(Категория: Linux)
Добавил Roman I Khimov
Пятница, 08 Апрель 2005, 00:49
Рассмотрение очередного набора патчей для ветки -stable завершилось и Грег Кроа-Хартман (Greg Kroah-Hartman) выложил новую версию ядра, 2.6.11.7 по привычным координатам на kernel.org.
Отдельной строкой Грег отметил, что в этом релизе по прежнему использует BitKeeper, так как пока еще не решено ничего с его заменой.
Патч Linux 2.6.11 -> 2.6.11.7, патч относительно 2.6.11.6 следует далее вместе с кратким обзором вошедших патчей.
Changelog:
Патч относительно 2.6.11.6:
Источник этой новости Центр информации по операционным системам
( http://www.osrc.info/news.php?extend.2219 )
(Категория: Linux)
Добавил Roman I Khimov
Пятница, 08 Апрель 2005, 00:49
Рассмотрение очередного набора патчей для ветки -stable завершилось и Грег Кроа-Хартман (Greg Kroah-Hartman) выложил новую версию ядра, 2.6.11.7 по привычным координатам на kernel.org.
Отдельной строкой Грег отметил, что в этом релизе по прежнему использует BitKeeper, так как пока еще не решено ничего с его заменой.
Патч Linux 2.6.11 -> 2.6.11.7, патч относительно 2.6.11.6 следует далее вместе с кратким обзором вошедших патчей.
Changelog:
------
Makefile | 2 +-
arch/ia64/kernel/fsys.S | 4 +++-
arch/ia64/kernel/signal.c | 3 ++-
arch/um/kernel/skas/uaccess.c | 3 ++-
drivers/i2c/chips/eeprom.c | 3 ++-
fs/jbd/transaction.c | 6 +++---
lib/rwsem-spinlock.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
lib/rwsem.c | 16 ++++++++++------
net/ipv4/tcp_input.c | 5 ++++-
net/ipv4/xfrm4_output.c | 12 ++++++------
net/ipv6/xfrm6_output.c | 12 ++++++------
sound/core/timer.c | 5 ++++-
12 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)
Summary of changes from v2.6.11.6 to v2.6.11.7
==============================================
Amy Griffis:
o fix ia64 syscall auditing
David Howells:
o rwsem fix
David S. Miller:
o Fix BIC congestion avoidance algorithm error
Greg Kroah-Hartman:
o Linux 2.6.11.7
Jean Delvare:
o I2C: Fix oops in eeprom driver
Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso:
o [patch 1/1] uml: va_copy fix
Patrick McHardy:
o Do not hold state lock while checking size
Stephen C. Tweedie:
o Prevent race condition in jbd
Takashi Iwai:
o Fix Oops with ALSA timer event notificationПатч относительно 2.6.11.6:
diff -Nru a/Makefile b/Makefile
--- a/Makefile 2005-04-07 11:59:01 -07:00
+++ b/Makefile 2005-04-07 11:59:01 -07:00
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
VERSION = 2
PATCHLEVEL = 6
SUBLEVEL = 11
-EXTRAVERSION = .6
+EXTRAVERSION = .7
NAME=Woozy Numbat
# *DOCUMENTATION*
diff -Nru a/arch/ia64/kernel/fsys.S b/arch/ia64/kernel/fsys.S
--- a/arch/ia64/kernel/fsys.S 2005-04-07 11:59:01 -07:00
+++ b/arch/ia64/kernel/fsys.S 2005-04-07 11:59:01 -07:00
@@ -611,8 +611,10 @@
movl r2=ia64_ret_from_syscall
;;
mov rp=r2 // set the real return addr
- tbit.z p8,p0=r3,TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE
+ and r3=_TIF_SYSCALL_TRACEAUDIT,r3
;;
+ cmp.eq p8,p0=r3,r0
+
(p10) br.cond.spnt.many ia64_ret_from_syscall // p10==true means out registers are more than 8
(p8) br.call.sptk.many b6=b6 // ignore this return addr
br.cond.sptk ia64_trace_syscall
diff -Nru a/arch/ia64/kernel/signal.c b/arch/ia64/kernel/signal.c
--- a/arch/ia64/kernel/signal.c 2005-04-07 11:59:01 -07:00
+++ b/arch/ia64/kernel/signal.c 2005-04-07 11:59:01 -07:00
@@ -224,7 +224,8 @@
* could be corrupted.
*/
retval = (long) &ia64_leave_kernel;
- if (test_thread_flag(TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE))
+ if (test_thread_flag(TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE)
+ || test_thread_flag(TIF_SYSCALL_AUDIT))
/*
* strace expects to be notified after sigreturn returns even though the
* context to which we return may not be in the middle of a syscall.
diff -Nru a/arch/um/kernel/skas/uaccess.c b/arch/um/kernel/skas/uaccess.c
--- a/arch/um/kernel/skas/uaccess.c 2005-04-07 11:59:01 -07:00
+++ b/arch/um/kernel/skas/uaccess.c 2005-04-07 11:59:01 -07:00
@@ -61,7 +61,8 @@
void *arg;
int *res;
- va_copy(args, *(va_list *)arg_ptr);
+ /* Some old gccs recognize __va_copy, but not va_copy */
+ __va_copy(args, *(va_list *)arg_ptr);
addr = va_arg(args, unsigned long);
len = va_arg(args, int);
is_write = va_arg(args, int);
diff -Nru a/drivers/i2c/chips/eeprom.c b/drivers/i2c/chips/eeprom.c
--- a/drivers/i2c/chips/eeprom.c 2005-04-07 11:59:01 -07:00
+++ b/drivers/i2c/chips/eeprom.c 2005-04-07 11:59:01 -07:00
@@ -130,7 +130,8 @@
/* Hide Vaio security settings to regular users (16 first bytes) */
if (data->nature == VAIO && off < 16 && !capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN)) {
- int in_row1 = 16 - off;
+ size_t in_row1 = 16 - off;
+ in_row1 = min(in_row1, count);
memset(buf, 0, in_row1);
if (count - in_row1 > 0)
memcpy(buf + in_row1, &data->data[16], count - in_row1);
diff -Nru a/fs/jbd/transaction.c b/fs/jbd/transaction.c
--- a/fs/jbd/transaction.c 2005-04-07 11:59:01 -07:00
+++ b/fs/jbd/transaction.c 2005-04-07 11:59:01 -07:00
@@ -1775,10 +1775,10 @@
JBUFFER_TRACE(jh, "checkpointed: add to BJ_Forget");
ret = __dispose_buffer(jh,
journal->j_running_transaction);
+ journal_put_journal_head(jh);
spin_unlock(&journal->j_list_lock);
jbd_unlock_bh_state(bh);
spin_unlock(&journal->j_state_lock);
- journal_put_journal_head(jh);
return ret;
} else {
/* There is no currently-running transaction. So the
@@ -1789,10 +1789,10 @@
JBUFFER_TRACE(jh, "give to committing trans");
ret = __dispose_buffer(jh,
journal->j_committing_transaction);
+ journal_put_journal_head(jh);
spin_unlock(&journal->j_list_lock);
jbd_unlock_bh_state(bh);
spin_unlock(&journal->j_state_lock);
- journal_put_journal_head(jh);
return ret;
} else {
/* The orphan record's transaction has
@@ -1813,10 +1813,10 @@
journal->j_running_transaction);
jh->b_next_transaction = NULL;
}
+ journal_put_journal_head(jh);
spin_unlock(&journal->j_list_lock);
jbd_unlock_bh_state(bh);
spin_unlock(&journal->j_state_lock);
- journal_put_journal_head(jh);
return 0;
} else {
/* Good, the buffer belongs to the running transaction.
diff -Nru a/lib/rwsem-spinlock.c b/lib/rwsem-spinlock.c
--- a/lib/rwsem-spinlock.c 2005-04-07 11:59:01 -07:00
+++ b/lib/rwsem-spinlock.c 2005-04-07 11:59:01 -07:00
@@ -140,12 +140,12 @@
rwsemtrace(sem, "Entering __down_read");
- spin_lock(&sem->wait_lock);
+ spin_lock_irq(&sem->wait_lock);
if (sem->activity >= 0 && list_empty(&sem->wait_list)) {
/* granted */
sem->activity++;
- spin_unlock(&sem->wait_lock);
+ spin_unlock_irq(&sem->wait_lock);
goto out;
}
@@ -160,7 +160,7 @@
list_add_tail(&waiter.list, &sem->wait_list);
/* we don't need to touch the semaphore struct anymore */
- spin_unlock(&sem->wait_lock);
+ spin_unlock_irq(&sem->wait_lock);
/* wait to be given the lock */
for (;;) {
@@ -181,10 +181,12 @@
*/
int fastcall __down_read_trylock(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
{
+ unsigned long flags;
int ret = 0;
+
rwsemtrace(sem, "Entering __down_read_trylock");
- spin_lock(&sem->wait_lock);
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&sem->wait_lock, flags);
if (sem->activity >= 0 && list_empty(&sem->wait_list)) {
/* granted */
@@ -192,7 +194,7 @@
ret = 1;
}
- spin_unlock(&sem->wait_lock);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sem->wait_lock, flags);
rwsemtrace(sem, "Leaving __down_read_trylock");
return ret;
@@ -209,12 +211,12 @@
rwsemtrace(sem, "Entering __down_write");
- spin_lock(&sem->wait_lock);
+ spin_lock_irq(&sem->wait_lock);
if (sem->activity == 0 && list_empty(&sem->wait_list)) {
/* granted */
sem->activity = -1;
- spin_unlock(&sem->wait_lock);
+ spin_unlock_irq(&sem->wait_lock);
goto out;
}
@@ -229,7 +231,7 @@
list_add_tail(&waiter.list, &sem->wait_list);
/* we don't need to touch the semaphore struct anymore */
- spin_unlock(&sem->wait_lock);
+ spin_unlock_irq(&sem->wait_lock);
/* wait to be given the lock */
for (;;) {
@@ -250,10 +252,12 @@
*/
int fastcall __down_write_trylock(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
{
+ unsigned long flags;
int ret = 0;
+
rwsemtrace(sem, "Entering __down_write_trylock");
- spin_lock(&sem->wait_lock);
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&sem->wait_lock, flags);
if (sem->activity == 0 && list_empty(&sem->wait_list)) {
/* granted */
@@ -261,7 +265,7 @@
ret = 1;
}
- spin_unlock(&sem->wait_lock);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sem->wait_lock, flags);
rwsemtrace(sem, "Leaving __down_write_trylock");
return ret;
@@ -272,14 +276,16 @@
*/
void fastcall __up_read(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
{
+ unsigned long flags;
+
rwsemtrace(sem, "Entering __up_read");
- spin_lock(&sem->wait_lock);
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&sem->wait_lock, flags);
if (--sem->activity == 0 && !list_empty(&sem->wait_list))
sem = __rwsem_wake_one_writer(sem);
- spin_unlock(&sem->wait_lock);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sem->wait_lock, flags);
rwsemtrace(sem, "Leaving __up_read");
}
@@ -289,15 +295,17 @@
*/
void fastcall __up_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
{
+ unsigned long flags;
+
rwsemtrace(sem, "Entering __up_write");
- spin_lock(&sem->wait_lock);
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&sem->wait_lock, flags);
sem->activity = 0;
if (!list_empty(&sem->wait_list))
sem = __rwsem_do_wake(sem, 1);
- spin_unlock(&sem->wait_lock);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sem->wait_lock, flags);
rwsemtrace(sem, "Leaving __up_write");
}
@@ -308,15 +316,17 @@
*/
void fastcall __downgrade_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
{
+ unsigned long flags;
+
rwsemtrace(sem, "Entering __downgrade_write");
- spin_lock(&sem->wait_lock);
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&sem->wait_lock, flags);
sem->activity = 1;
if (!list_empty(&sem->wait_list))
sem = __rwsem_do_wake(sem, 0);
- spin_unlock(&sem->wait_lock);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sem->wait_lock, flags);
rwsemtrace(sem, "Leaving __downgrade_write");
}
diff -Nru a/lib/rwsem.c b/lib/rwsem.c
--- a/lib/rwsem.c 2005-04-07 11:59:01 -07:00
+++ b/lib/rwsem.c 2005-04-07 11:59:01 -07:00
@@ -150,7 +150,7 @@
set_task_state(tsk, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
/* set up my own style of waitqueue */
- spin_lock(&sem->wait_lock);
+ spin_lock_irq(&sem->wait_lock);
waiter->task = tsk;
get_task_struct(tsk);
@@ -163,7 +163,7 @@
if (!(count & RWSEM_ACTIVE_MASK))
sem = __rwsem_do_wake(sem, 0);
- spin_unlock(&sem->wait_lock);
+ spin_unlock_irq(&sem->wait_lock);
/* wait to be given the lock */
for (;;) {
@@ -219,15 +219,17 @@
*/
struct rw_semaphore fastcall *rwsem_wake(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
{
+ unsigned long flags;
+
rwsemtrace(sem, "Entering rwsem_wake");
- spin_lock(&sem->wait_lock);
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&sem->wait_lock, flags);
/* do nothing if list empty */
if (!list_empty(&sem->wait_list))
sem = __rwsem_do_wake(sem, 0);
- spin_unlock(&sem->wait_lock);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sem->wait_lock, flags);
rwsemtrace(sem, "Leaving rwsem_wake");
@@ -241,15 +243,17 @@
*/
struct rw_semaphore fastcall *rwsem_downgrade_wake(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
{
+ unsigned long flags;
+
rwsemtrace(sem, "Entering rwsem_downgrade_wake");
- spin_lock(&sem->wait_lock);
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&sem->wait_lock, flags);
/* do nothing if list empty */
if (!list_empty(&sem->wait_list))
sem = __rwsem_do_wake(sem, 1);
- spin_unlock(&sem->wait_lock);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sem->wait_lock, flags);
rwsemtrace(sem, "Leaving rwsem_downgrade_wake");
return sem;
diff -Nru a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c 2005-04-07 11:59:01 -07:00
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c 2005-04-07 11:59:01 -07:00
@@ -1653,7 +1653,10 @@
static void tcp_undo_cwr(struct tcp_sock *tp, int undo)
{
if (tp->prior_ssthresh) {
- tp->snd_cwnd = max(tp->snd_cwnd, tp->snd_ssthresh<<1);
+ if (tcp_is_bic(tp))
+ tp->snd_cwnd = max(tp->snd_cwnd, tp->bictcp.last_max_cwnd);
+ else
+ tp->snd_cwnd = max(tp->snd_cwnd, tp->snd_ssthresh<<1);
if (undo && tp->prior_ssthresh > tp->snd_ssthresh) {
tp->snd_ssthresh = tp->prior_ssthresh;
diff -Nru a/net/ipv4/xfrm4_output.c b/net/ipv4/xfrm4_output.c
--- a/net/ipv4/xfrm4_output.c 2005-04-07 11:59:01 -07:00
+++ b/net/ipv4/xfrm4_output.c 2005-04-07 11:59:01 -07:00
@@ -103,16 +103,16 @@
goto error_nolock;
}
- spin_lock_bh(&x->lock);
- err = xfrm_state_check(x, skb);
- if (err)
- goto error;
-
if (x->props.mode) {
err = xfrm4_tunnel_check_size(skb);
if (err)
- goto error;
+ goto error_nolock;
}
+
+ spin_lock_bh(&x->lock);
+ err = xfrm_state_check(x, skb);
+ if (err)
+ goto error;
xfrm4_encap(skb);
diff -Nru a/net/ipv6/xfrm6_output.c b/net/ipv6/xfrm6_output.c
--- a/net/ipv6/xfrm6_output.c 2005-04-07 11:59:01 -07:00
+++ b/net/ipv6/xfrm6_output.c 2005-04-07 11:59:01 -07:00
@@ -103,16 +103,16 @@
goto error_nolock;
}
- spin_lock_bh(&x->lock);
- err = xfrm_state_check(x, skb);
- if (err)
- goto error;
-
if (x->props.mode) {
err = xfrm6_tunnel_check_size(skb);
if (err)
- goto error;
+ goto error_nolock;
}
+
+ spin_lock_bh(&x->lock);
+ err = xfrm_state_check(x, skb);
+ if (err)
+ goto error;
xfrm6_encap(skb);
diff -Nru a/sound/core/timer.c b/sound/core/timer.c
--- a/sound/core/timer.c 2005-04-07 11:59:01 -07:00
+++ b/sound/core/timer.c 2005-04-07 11:59:01 -07:00
@@ -1117,7 +1117,8 @@
if (tu->qused >= tu->queue_size) {
tu->overrun++;
} else {
- memcpy(&tu->queue[tu->qtail++], tread, sizeof(*tread));
+ memcpy(&tu->tqueue[tu->qtail++], tread, sizeof(*tread));
+ tu->qtail %= tu->queue_size;
tu->qused++;
}
}
@@ -1140,6 +1141,8 @@
spin_lock(&tu->qlock);
snd_timer_user_append_to_tqueue(tu, &r1);
spin_unlock(&tu->qlock);
+ kill_fasync(&tu->fasync, SIGIO, POLL_IN);
+ wake_up(&tu->qchange_sleep);
}
static void snd_timer_user_tinterrupt(snd_timer_instance_t *timeri,Источник этой новости Центр информации по операционным системам
( http://www.osrc.info/news.php?extend.2219 )